ADA website compliance services for accessible websites and web apps
If your website is hard to use with a keyboard or screen reader, it blocks people with disabilities from reaching your services — and it exposes you to legal claims. We find the real accessibility barriers on your site, fix them with your team in priority order, and document the work so you have a record that stands up. You get a site that works for more customers and measurably lower risk.
Our ADA web compliance services
We identify the usability issues affecting your real users, manually validate each one, and map every finding to its WCAG success criterion — so the work can be tracked, verified, and defended.
Clear scope and page selection
We focus the effort on the pages and flows where most of your users actually navigate: high-traffic templates, revenue-critical journeys, and the areas a legal claim would examine first.
Manual verification beyond automated scans
Automated scans are the starting point, but they detect only the machine-checkable portion of issues. We test your site by hand with keyboards, screen readers (JAWS, NVDA, VoiceOver), and screen magnification — the way people with disabilities actually use it.
WCAG-mapped findings your team can use
Every issue comes with its WCAG success criterion, a clear description, its location, and evidence — not a raw scanner export your developers have to interpret.
Practical remediation direction
For each finding, you get actionable guidance your developers can build a fix plan from, ranked by user impact and legal risk so the highest-exposure issues are addressed first.
Re-test support to confirm updates
After your fixes ship, we re-test to confirm improvements and catch regressions. Your record then shows resolved, verified issues — not open findings.
Documentation you can defend
You end up with a record of what was tested, what was fixed, and when — the documentation that supports an accessibility statement and answers a reviewer, a partner, or opposing counsel.
Scanners find patterns. What no scanner can do is validate how users interact with your website, how assistive technologies behave, or how the complex components on a typical page hold up in real use. That manual layer is the core of what you are buying.
What ADA website compliance means
The ADA is a civil rights law, and it does not publish a step-by-step technical checklist for websites. Courts and the U.S. Department of Justice fill that gap with WCAG — the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines — as the benchmark for whether people with disabilities can actually use a site. So ADA website compliance comes down to three things: knowing which barriers exist on your site measured against WCAG, removing them in priority order, and holding documentation that proves the work.
That is exactly the service we deliver. We concentrate on the barriers that stop your users from completing the tasks your business depends on — navigation, forms, checkout flows, account areas, search — and we leave you with the evidence trail.
Who must comply with ADA website requirements
- Businesses open to the public. Under Title III, courts have applied the ADA to websites of retailers, restaurants, hotels, healthcare providers, banks, and service businesses. Public-facing e-commerce sites are the most frequent lawsuit targets.
- State and local government entities. Under Title II, a 2024 Department of Justice rule sets an explicit technical standard and fixed deadlines — covered below.
- Schools, universities, and nonprofits that serve the public.
- Vendors under contract, where accessibility requirements flow down through enterprise procurement and partner agreements.
If your obligation comes from federal procurement, that is Section 508 compliance — a separate framework we also cover. And if you recognize your organization in this list, the practical first step is the same for all of them: find out where your site actually stands. That is a scoped audit, and it is where we start every engagement.
ADA website compliance requirements: what WCAG 2.1 AA expects
WCAG organizes accessibility around four principles — content must be perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. At the commonly referenced conformance level, WCAG 2.1 Level AA, that translates into concrete, testable requirements. These are the ones that decide most real-world claims:
- Images carry meaningful alternative text so screen reader users know what they convey (Success Criterion 1.1.1).
- Every function works with a keyboard alone — no mouse-only menus, carousels, or date pickers (2.1.1).
- Form fields have labels that assistive technology announces, so users know what to enter (3.3.2).
- Links and buttons describe their purpose instead of reading "click here" or nothing at all (2.4.4).
- Text meets minimum color-contrast ratios (1.4.3), and interface components meet non-text contrast requirements (1.4.11).
- Video content includes captions (1.2.2).
- Keyboard focus stays visible (2.4.7) and moves in a logical order (2.4.3) as users tab through a page.
Your site does not need to look different to meet these requirements — accessible sites look like ordinary modern websites. The difference is in the markup, the components, and whether the flows actually work with assistive technology. Our audit tests every one of these criteria by hand, on your real pages and flows, and shows you exactly which ones fail and where.
The ADA Title II web rule and its deadlines
For state and local government, the standard is no longer a matter of interpretation. The Department of Justice's 2024 final rule under Title II adopts WCAG 2.1 Level AA for web content and mobile apps. After DOJ extended the original dates by one year in April 2026, the current compliance deadlines are April 26, 2027 for public entities serving 50,000 or more people, and April 26, 2028 for entities serving fewer than 50,000 and for special district governments.
If you are a public entity planning against these dates, start earlier than feels necessary: remediation and validation take longer than the audit itself, and the rule reaches mobile apps and third-party content, not just your main site. We help public-sector teams turn the deadline into a scoped, sequenced plan — audit first, highest-impact fixes next, validation and documentation before the date.
Website accessibility lawsuits and demand letters
Thousands of website accessibility lawsuits are filed in U.S. courts every year, alongside a much larger volume of pre-suit demand letters. Public-facing businesses — retail, food service, hospitality, healthcare, finance — are the most common targets, and a small number of plaintiff firms file claims at volume. Courts evaluate these claims against WCAG, and the issues cited most often are the same ones a manual audit finds first: missing alt text, unlabeled form fields, links without accessible names, and functionality that cannot be operated with a keyboard.
If a demand letter has already landed on your desk: do not ignore it, and do not rush to install a widget. What changes the conversation with opposing counsel is a documented, standards-based response — an audit that establishes where the site stands, fixes to the highest-risk barriers, validation that they held, and a record of all of it. We run that engagement start to finish, and the same work protects you against the next claim, not just this one.
Why overlays and widgets do not deliver ADA compliance
Accessibility overlays promise compliance through a single line of JavaScript. They cannot deliver it. An overlay does not rewrite inaccessible markup, repair a broken focus order, label your form fields in the underlying code, or make a custom component work with a screen reader. Legal reviews do not treat an installed overlay as evidence of compliance — websites running overlays continue to receive demand letters and lawsuits, and in some cases the overlay itself introduces new barriers.
We take the opposite approach: fix the barriers in your actual design and code, test the result with real assistive technology, and document it. If you were sold an overlay and suspect it is not protecting you, an audit will show you in concrete terms what it is and is not covering — and what to fix underneath it.
What you receive in an ADA compliance engagement
- An audit report with every barrier mapped to the WCAG success criterion it fails, its location, and supporting evidence.
- Findings ranked by severity and legal exposure, so remediation starts where it matters.
- Implementation-ready remediation guidance for your development team.
- A statement of coverage: the templates, components, and user flows tested.
- A re-test after remediation confirming resolved issues and catching regressions.
- Documentation that supports an accessibility statement and a defensible record of the work and its timing.
Your ADA website accessibility consultant, from first audit to ongoing support
When you engage us, you get a consultant who tells you plainly what to fix first and why — not a report that sits in a drawer. Teams typically come to us in one of four situations: an accessibility complaint or demand letter just arrived; legal risk is expanding and leadership wants it handled; a redesign or platform migration is coming and accessibility should be built in rather than retrofitted; or an enterprise contract now requires measurable evidence of accessibility.
In every case the job is the same: give you clarity on where the site stands, priorities your team can execute, and a defensible record of how accessibility was addressed. If the work needs to survive scrutiny — from a court, a plaintiff's expert, or a procurement reviewer — that is what we build for.
Why teams choose ADA Compliance Pros
Assume the work will be scrutinized, and choose your ADA compliance company accordingly. Here is what we commit to on every engagement:
- Manual testing with real assistive technology — never scan-only "audits."
- Every finding mapped to a WCAG success criterion, so conformance claims can be verified by anyone.
- Re-testing after remediation, so "fixed" is confirmed rather than assumed.
- No overlay shortcuts and no instant-compliance claims — we fix code, not appearances.
- Support that fits your release cycles, so accessibility is sustained over time instead of decaying after a one-time report.
Whoever you choose, ask them to commit to these five points in writing — they are what separates a defensible engagement from a report that will not survive scrutiny.
Trusted by leading brands
We are proud of our customers
Common questions about ADA website compliance
What is ADA website compliance?
Is ADA website compliance legally required?
Can I be sued for not having an accessible website?
What is an ADA demand letter, and what should I do if I get one?
Are accessibility overlays or plugins enough for ADA compliance?
Does my small business website need to be ADA compliant?
What does an ADA compliance consultant actually do?
How long does ADA website compliance take?
What are the ADA Title II deadlines?
Is ADA the same as WCAG?
Find out where your website stands
Whether this starts from a demand letter, a redesign, or a decision to get ahead of the risk — the first step is the same: a clear view of your site's accessibility and a prioritized path forward.
Schedule a consult (opens in new tab)