Web accessibility services: audits, testing and compliance
Web accessibility means people with disabilities can use your website or web application independently — with keyboards, screen readers, and other assistive technology. We test how your site actually performs for those users, map every barrier to WCAG, and give you a prioritized path to fix it. And because accessibility arrives under many names, we route you to the exact compliance track your situation requires.
Web accessibility services
ADA website compliance
For public-facing sites managing legal exposure. Courts use WCAG as the benchmark, and the work is an audit, prioritized fixes, validation, and a record you can defend.
Learn moreWCAG audits & testing
The standards-based technical evaluation against WCAG 2.1 or 2.2, criterion by criterion, combining automated checks with manual and assistive-technology testing.
Learn moreAccessible design
Building accessibility into layouts, components, and UX decisions before development begins — where fixes cost the least and barriers never ship.
Learn moreWebsite accessibility services for WCAG and ADA compliance
Accessibility work has one honest starting point: knowing where your site stands. Our web accessibility audit pairs expert manual review with assistive-technology testing, using keyboards and screen readers the way real users do. Every barrier we find is mapped to a WCAG success criterion and ranked by impact, so your team gets a prioritized fix path instead of a raw scanner export.
That evidence carries into whichever compliance requirement brought you here. The same criteria-mapped findings serve an ADA legal question, a federal Section 508 obligation, and a buyer's VPAT request — one audit, done properly, feeds all three.
Accessibility audit, WCAG audit, ADA, or Section 508: which one you need
Website accessibility compliance services get requested under several names: accessibility audit, WCAG audit, ADA audit, Section 508 review. The terms are used interchangeably, but they answer different questions, and choosing the wrong track wastes weeks and budget:
- Managing legal exposure on a public-facing site — that is ADA website compliance: audit, prioritized fixes, validation, and a defensible record.
- Selling to or working for federal agencies — that is Section 508 compliance, measured against WCAG 2.0 Level A and AA.
- A buyer asked for accessibility documentation — that is a VPAT/ACR, built on real audit evidence.
- Your team needs a standards-based technical evaluation — that is a WCAG audit against 2.1 or 2.2, criterion by criterion.
- You are building or redesigning and want accessibility from the start — that is accessible design, so barriers never ship.
Starting with a single audit avoids scoping work against the wrong standard, and the evidence carries forward to whichever track applies. All of our website accessibility services run off that first audit, so nothing is tested twice when the requirement turns out to be Section 508 or a buyer's VPAT rather than an ADA question. Tell us your situation on a consult and we will point you to the right track in plain terms, including when the answer is a smaller engagement than you expected.
How we test website accessibility
We test websites and web applications the way people with disabilities actually use them, then report in a form your developers can work from.
Keyboard-only navigation
We operate your site without a mouse to surface keyboard traps, unreachable controls, and flows that cannot be completed at all.
Screen reader testing
JAWS, NVDA, and VoiceOver across common browser pairings, so you learn what your content actually announces to a screen reader user.
Magnification and contrast
Screen magnification and contrast checks that catch what breaks when a page is zoomed or read by someone with low vision.
Automated baseline
Tooling clears the machine-detectable issues first, so the manual effort goes where it actually adds value.
Templates, components, flows
We test the patterns that repeat across your product and the journeys that drive task completion, not a random sample of pages.
Criteria-mapped reporting
Each finding is tied to its WCAG success criterion with location, evidence, severity, and a fix your developers can execute.
Automated checks run first and clear the machine-detectable issues; manual testing then covers what no scanner can — keyboard traps, unlabeled controls, focus that disappears, and flows that cannot be completed without a mouse. Documents, mobile apps, and other asset types are scoped during the consult.
What you receive in a website accessibility audit
- An audit report with each finding mapped to a specific WCAG success criterion, its location, and supporting evidence.
- Findings ranked by user impact, so remediation starts where it matters most.
- Remediation guidance written for your developers — implementation-ready, not abstract.
- A clear statement of coverage: the templates, components, and user flows tested.
- A retest after your fixes ship, confirming what is resolved, plus an executive summary for stakeholders.
- Evidence formatted to carry forward into ADA compliance, Section 508, or VPAT/ACR work.
Trusted by leading brands
We are proud of our customers
Common questions about web accessibility
How do we know which service we actually need?
What do we receive from an accessibility audit?
How do you scope an audit for a large site?
Can you test our mobile app or our documents as well?
Is an overlay or widget a shortcut we can take?
Do you fix the problems, or only find them?
How often should we re-test?
Can you work alongside the agency that built our site?
Who does this work
David LoPresti's work centers on translating WCAG and Section 508 requirements into practical implementation and verification processes, which is exactly what an audit of a website has to produce: the failing success criterion named, the place it fails shown, and a fix a developer can actually build. You receive criteria-mapped findings, remediation planning you can schedule against your release cycle, and a retest that confirms what the fixes resolved.
The standards this page refers to
- W3C: WCAG conformance levels and success criteria
- W3C: WCAG 2.2, the current version of the standard
- W3C: WCAG-EM, the methodology for evaluating a whole website
- The ADA web accessibility rule for state and local government, which names WCAG 2.1 Level AA (28 CFR Part 35, Subpart H)
- FTC: $1 million final order against accessibility overlay vendor accessiBe
Ready to improve your web accessibility?
Start with the audit: a clear view of where your site stands, what to fix first, and which compliance track your situation actually requires.
Schedule a consult (opens in new tab)