Accessibility Knowledge Hub

Three publishers, four 2025 web accessibility lawsuit totals. What each method counts, which figure holds up in a board paper, and what none of them see.

Kansas, Utah, Missouri and Georgia enacted abusive-litigation statutes. None of them pauses a federal ADA claim. What the cure record must contain, and by when.

Federal agencies self-score 2.00 and 1.96 out of 5 on testing and conformance. Here is GSA's published scale as a self-assessment, plus the phased funding case.

A buyer's matrix of five accessibility engagement types: what each one produces, who signs it, what moves the price, and when you do not need the expensive option.

Which conformance level a widget lets you write, what Remarks and Evaluation Methods Used must disclose, and the federal test a reviewer runs against that row.

No US rule requires screen reader testing. Here is why naming the pairings still decides your ACR, the WebAIM numbers behind a cutoff, and the version rule.

A copy-pasteable Section 508 clause library, a QASP surveillance table with usable acceptable quality levels, and the FAR remedy behind each clause after award.

E204.1 triggers on a gap in Chapters 4 and 5, not an inapplicable criterion. The decision tree, the nine conditional rows, and annotated federal ACR examples.

Trusted Tester evidence covers 38 WCAG 2.0 rows, while a Title II or Section 504 buyer needs 50. How to check coverage, competence and version before you pay.

None of the six Section 508 exceptions belongs to the vendor. What the responsible agency official needs from a bid team for each branch, and who signs.

A scored, weighted instrument for federal reviewers judging a vendor ACR at source selection: twelve weighted flags, a rejection-remedy tree, what not to flag.

Section 508 sits on WCAG 2.0 A and AA. Title II and HHS Section 504 require WCAG 2.1 A and AA. No CFR provision requires 2.2. The version-by-rule matrix, cited.