Accessibility Knowledge Hub

Reflow, non-text contrast, text spacing, focus not obscured and target size: the number, the named exceptions, and which US rule actually binds each one.

A curriculum specification for a training RFP: five roles, the modules each owns, hours summed from named public courses, and a competency check per module.

Which legacy documents are in scope under the Title II and Section 504 web rules, how to route each one before the 2027 dates, and a cost model with its inputs shown.

Only one of the three publishes a rate card. Every public figure with its source and retrieval date, plus the lines a widget subscription excludes by contract.

The documentation-quality base rate behind the VPAT accuracy question: 28 published ACRs scored on the document alone, with the frame, the rubric and counts beside every percentage.

Four regimes govern self-service kiosks and they give different answers. Which standard to name in the RFP, the values to specify, and how to test at delivery.

Three publishers, four 2025 web accessibility lawsuit totals. What each method counts, which figure holds up in a board paper, and what none of them see.

Kansas, Utah, Missouri and Georgia enacted abusive-litigation statutes. None of them pauses a federal ADA claim. What the cure record must contain, and by when.

Federal agencies self-score 2.00 and 1.96 out of 5 on testing and conformance. Here is GSA's published scale as a self-assessment, plus the phased funding case.

A buyer's matrix of five accessibility engagement types: what each one produces, who signs it, what moves the price, and when you do not need the expensive option.

Which conformance level a widget lets you write, what Remarks and Evaluation Methods Used must disclose, and the federal test a reviewer runs against that row.

No US rule requires screen reader testing. Here is why naming the pairings still decides your ACR, the WebAIM numbers behind a cutoff, and the version rule.